« Help for a French Rep Writing to a Chinese Customer in English | Main | Results of our Client's Survey on E-Mail Writing Principles »

December 19, 2009

Comments

David Kay

The thing that's most jarring about this poor bit of writing is its whipsaw changes in tone. The first paragraph sounds like she's trying to be fairly formal and almost literary:

"Some are preparing Hanukkah gifts and lighting candles, others are putting up Christmas trees in their homes, and all of us are looking forward to a more settled, peaceful and economically stable New Year."

That sentence, which you eliminated in your masterful rewrite, makes me think I'm can sit back, slow down, and have a thoughtful read.

Wrong.

Much of the rest of the letter sounds like it was written on a Blackberry or iPhone and sent without editing. Consider "I wanted to provide access this information in this message" [sic]; even a quick once-over would have caught the missing "to," but the more fundamental issue is "this information." What information? Was she really going to share compensation information for all top managers in a holiday email? Or was she referring to just managers in her district? Or perhaps a link to the information? The bill? Each interpretation is less plausible than the one before.

We move quickly back into practiced, polished, political speak: "This legislation would show you one reason why the medical costs in this country are the highest in the world, while our health outcomes are among the lowest among economically advanced countries."

That's followed immediately by a casual sentence fragment: "Certainly not the only cost driver, but indicative of some of our health care cost problems." The late Charles Shell, my eighth-grade English teacher, failed his students for that. Fragments have their place, but not in a letter like this.

The worst offense is as much political as it is editorial. She writes "Last year one of my bills allowed ordinary citizens to learn..." but later, it's clear that the correct mood was subjunctive, not indicative. She didn't get her bill passed, so it hasn't allowed anyone to do anything. Poor writing, or deliberate weaseling? It's hard to say, although I'm voting for some of each.

She should hire you guys next time she wants to send a letter.

Best,
David

The comments to this entry are closed.